The War of the Wales activity has started to kick in again, so I must update you on our news. It’s been a fascinating week in the process.
On Wednesday I had some disappointing news, which I won’t announce here just yet because if circumstances change – well – I like to keep doors open where possible, I do not side with Mr Macbeth on that one, what’s done can always be undone. we have a brilliant (if somewhat controversial) alternative…but it did all knock me back a peg or two, to the degree that I almost postponed Wednesday’s script meeting. Luckily Mr Maddrell dug his heels in and I hauled my sorry-for-myself arse across to the Hoop and Grapes. Andy, Alan and I met for a discussion of the play and what needs to remain/be enhanced for the ‘Fringe Cut’.
It was agreed that audiences seem to love the heightened language which I am going to spend some time on in terms of the transitions – I like writing the verse so from that point onwards I got excited and happy again, which was such a relief – it’s still there – I suspect it always will be with this play!
We are rewriting 1:1 to make it a more immediate entry point to the play, as we feel that it took audiences a while to understand where we where, when we were and why we were sometimes saying it in pentameter. That proposal led us to look at the newsreader/journalist roles and we are going to pay much more careful attention to what they say and how they say it and also try to link it in with the press. Ironic that I kept hard news at one remove from the press scenes. It’s almost as if I don’t think journalists can be relied on to report. Wonder why that might be?
Most of the work we have to do is on the journalists…wherever we relax into prose we seem to lose something…but there is a stylistic reason for having the press speak in mainly prose. I thought my return to the directing work would be relatively simple, but I see that I am going to have to do I bit of revision of my vision! This makes it all the more important for me to get my producer and Stage Manager completely involved as soon as possible.
Andy had to dash off for KDC’s next season’s auditions, but Alan and I had a good talk about the theatricality of the text and how to make the play clearer and if possible, a little cleverer. I left the pub feeling extraordinarily happy, even if I did fall off my bike slightly as I said goodbye to Alan. I am a past mistress of bathos.
In other news, on Tuesday night I went to Westminster* for a Labour History Group discussion and I had the great good luck to listen to Shaun Woodward, Neil Stewart and Peter Kellner’s take on the 1992 Election campaign of which I will talk more later when we’ve done a bit more writing and I’ve gathered my notes…Peter started his piece by saying ‘Never has any journalist written so much bollocks in any election in any country.’ Which is rather amusing when you consider he was writing for the Independent and working on Newsnight at the time.
*As we went through security and walked up through the hall the to committee rooms we were slightly stalking Hugh Grant of all people (this is vaguely relevant as appears in one of the slides in the play!) I was extraordinarily excited and my companion later chided me for being more impressed at walking behind Hugh Grant than sitting next to Newsnight’s Michael Crick.





